"We teach and learn in community."
Teaching.IU connects instructors to university-wide resources and communities of educators across IU. The vision of the site is to gather and curate a wide array of teaching resources, seamlessly integrated and available to all instructors.
This ongoing effort is led by the Faculty Academy on Excellence in Teaching (FACET) in collaboration with University Information Technology Services (UITS), campus teaching centers...and most significantly you.
The Connected Professor
Considering Generative AI and Virtual Reality for teaching and learning
2023 Year End
Conversations with The Connected Professor
Join a faculty panel on ChatGPT a year later. Their take: A lot of hype, some definite potential
Read the articleThe latest from JoSoTL
The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Navigating Controversy and Hot Topics in Required Diversity Courses
By: Ryan Miller, Laura Struve, Morgan Murray, Alex Tompkins
Required undergraduate diversity courses often expose students to topics and worldviews which may push them out of their comfort zones and prompt dissonance and even resistance. This paper reports on interviews with 68 faculty members at five predominantly white institutions in the Southern United States, detailing how they navigated discussion of controversial and “hot” topics in required diversity courses. Most instructors evidenced a critical-functionalist perspective in their approaches, as they aimed to expose students to critical social issues, yet were concerned that resistance could disturb the learning process. Primary strategies for handling hot topics in class included proactively establishing community and safety and normalizing conflict, and reactively acknowledging and surfacing multiple perspectives, as well as connecting content to students’ lived experiences. Some instructors also reported a lack of controversy or conflict in their classrooms, which they variously attributed to student characteristics or their own disinclination to promote heated discussion. We conclude the paper with implications for faculty, educational developers, administrators, and institutions.